Abstract
Good faith acquisition in real estate in Latvian law is very little regulated, and is not defined directly in the regulatory enactments, while the protection of the good faith acquirer stems from interpretations of the legal provisions. In view of the lack of material-legal regulation and uncertainties in it, in particular, the question of obtaining good faith acquisition in real estate refers to conflicting and unpredictable case law - in seemingly similar situations, the court tends to take diametrically opposed decisions. The legislator has not developed guidelines and clear criteria for how, when and by which time, a good faith acquirer of real estate is protected. These conflicting decisions give rise to a debate in the public on the good faith acquirer institute in general and on how the legal provisions relating to it are to be interpreted.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: INDIVIDUAL. SOCIETY. STATE. Proceedings of the International Student and Teacher Scientific and Practical Conference
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
