Abstract
The federal navigational servitude provides that when the federal gov? ernment regulates tidal or navigable fresh waters in order to protect naviga? tion, it need not compensate for any loss caused to private interests in these waters. This Note considers the question of whether this takings defense should also apply when the federal government regulates waterways for con? servation purposes. It argues that the federal navigational servitude has the same common law roots as state public trust doctrines, most of which would provide a takings defense for a state's conservation-promoting action. The navigational focus of the federal navigational servitude was the result of early limits on the federal government's Commerce Clause powers, rather than limits inherent in the federal navigational servitude. Thus, where the Commerce Clause now allows conservation-promoting federal action, the fed? eral government should benefit from the same takings defense that state pub? lic trust doctrines would provide to similar state government action.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.