Abstract

Purpose. This research presents experimental modeling and numerical analysis on reducing stress and protecting buried pipelines using three arrangements techniques of expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam blocks: embankment, EPS block embracing the upper part of the pipe and EPS blocks as two posts and a beam. Methods. An experimental model consisted of steel tank with boundaries dimensions depending on the diameter of the pipe located at the center of it. The backfill on the pipe was made from sand and embedded EPS blocks with two techniques: EPS block embracing the upper part of the pipe and EPS blocks form two posts and a beam. Series of experiments were carried out using static loading on rigid steel plate to measure the pipe deformations and strains, as well as backfill surface displacement. The numerical analysis was used to simulate the experimental model using the finite element software program PLAXIS-3D. Findings. The results reveal that the most effective method which prevents stress on the buried flexible pipe was EPS post and beam system followed by EPS embracing the upper part of the pipe. The results obtained from the numerical analysis and the experiment demonstrate the same trend. The parametric study shows that EPS post and beam blocks model has higher surface displacement than embracing the upper part of the pipe model, which is more effective in case of high rigidity of the pipe. Originality. Reducing stress on buried pipes using different geofoam shapes to find which one is the optimum method. Practical implications. Two configurations of EPS geofoam blocks – EPS block embracing the upper part of the pipe and EPS blocks post and beam system - ensure successful stress reduction and protect buried pipes

Highlights

  • This research presents experimental modeling and numerical analysis on reducing stress and protecting buried pipelines using three arrangements techniques of expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam blocks: embankment, EPS block embracing the upper part of the pipe and EPS blocks as two posts and a beam

  • The results show that the best two models are EPS block post and beam and EPS block embracing the upper part of the pipe part

  • The model analyzes the effect of two EPS geofoam configurations – EPS embracing the upper part of the pipe model and EPS post and beam model – on reducing the stress on the buried pipe with real scale dimensions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This research presents experimental modeling and numerical analysis on reducing stress and protecting buried pipelines using three arrangements techniques of expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam blocks: embankment, EPS block embracing the upper part of the pipe and EPS blocks as two posts and a beam. Tarek et al (2018) [10] studies the effect of four techniques with EPS geofoam on reduction of the earth pressure on flexible buried pipes using the experimental and numerical models. Bahr et al (2019) [12] used experimental model tests to study the stress reduction techniques of EPS geofoam and deformation of buried pipes and the soil backfill behavior under static loading. This research investigates reduction of the stress and deformation of unplasticized polyvinyl chloride (UPVC) buried pipes using two methods of embedded geofoam blocks by performing a series of experimental model tests under static surface loading. The experimental results are compared with the finite element software program PLAXIS-3D of the same model

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call