Abstract
The aims were to report the incidence and outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation-infective endocarditis (TAVI-IE) from a high-volume TAVI centre in the United Kingdom, including how incidence varies relative to time from the procedure, and to assess the performance of modified Duke criteria in the diagnosis of TAVI-IE. The retrospective, cohort study included all patients who underwent TAVI at Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust during a 10-year period. Outcome measures were the incidence of TAVI-IE, the accuracy of the modified Duke criteria and the mortality rate. A total of 1337 patients were followed up for a median of 2.3 years. Thirteen patients (0.97%) were diagnosed with TAVI-IE, mean age of 81.3 years (SD 5.1 years). Four patients (30.8%) fulfilled modified Duke criteria for definite infective endocarditis. The remaining nine patients (69.2%) fulfilled the modified Duke criteria for possible infective endocarditis. In the majority (7/13; 53.8%) the causative organism was streptococcal. Cumulative incidence of TAVI-IE has risen in line with the number of patients living with TAVI prostheses, and cumulative number of TAVI-years. However, in relation to the number of 100 TAVI-years, the infection rate has remained low and static over the last 6 years. The in-hospital mortality rate was 38.5%, all attributable to TAVI-IE. The incidence of TAVI-IE was 0.97%, with an associated all-cause mortality of 53.8%. The incidence relative to the number of TAVI-years has remained low and static in recent years. The modified Duke criteria have relatively low sensitivity in the diagnosis of TAVI-IE, meaning that a high index of suspicion is required.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.