Abstract

Development of total hip arthroplasty (THA) now spans more than 5 decades encompassing combinations of metal-on-metal (MOM), ceramic-on-metal (COM), metal-on-plastic (MOP), ceramic-on-plastic (COM), and ceramic-on-ceramic (COC). In every arena of extensive technical development, there exists a data set that when viewed in isolation seemed of little import, but when assembled in-toto may produce a generational shift in perception. Our review focused on two such THA events. Firstly, COC retrieval studies (1999-2001) noted habitual wear patterns on heads and peripheral wear stripes, along with femoral-neck impingement, and ceramic surfaces stained gray by metal debris. These COC data indicated THA risks included, 1) cup edge-loading (E/L) on heads producing “stripe wear”, 2) component impingement releasing metal particles resulting in 3) tissues contaminated by metal debris. A corresponding MOM impingement-debris mechanism was only perceived by Howie (2005) in a McKee-Farrar retrieval study. Our anticipation at LLUMC was that MOM retrievals would provide superior wear details to those seen on COC retrievals. We noted stripe wear in the polar zone of CoCr heads and basal stripes in the non-wear areas. The basal-polar stripe combinations were found in all MOM retrievals. Basal-polar stripe combinations followed cup-rim profiles in our LLUMC simulations of prosthetic impingement. LPUH videos demonstrated the formation of stripe wear in functional-standing and functional-sitting postures for both impingement and subluxation episodes using THA and RA designs. The stripes on CoCr heads revealed the large scratches we now term “microgrooves”. Microgroove width varied from 40 - 400 um with 100 um being typical. The longitudinal striations in microgrooves, the raised jagged lips, scratches with shallow entry and exit termini, were all indicative of a classic 3rd-body wear mechanism. The THA impingement simulations denoted four sites of edge-loading, i.e. neck-E/L, inferior cup-E/L, superior cup-E/l and head-E/L, and ingress of Ti64 particles as a contaminating-roughness effect. Individual MOM cases referred to LLUMC demonstrated dramatic evidence of neck notching. At one end of the debris spectrum, a Ti64-notch model predicting a 6 mm3 annual wear-rate represented the release of 5700 particles of 126 um-size (approximating daily release of 16 particles). At the other end of the spectrum, if metal particles were crushed between MOM surfaces to the equivalent nanometer size found in tissues, our notch model represented approximately 22-trillion Ti64 particles annually deposited in tissues. The anatomical THA models represented in LPUH videos demonstrated that even 1-degree of head subluxation from a rigid cup created a cup “lift-off” scenario (CLO) that would open a gap of 250 - 400 microns between femoral head and cup. This would void all lubrication potential and focus the total hip-joint force along the beveled cup rim, i.e. stripe wear. It is therefore interesting that MOM impingement/debris predictions by Howie et al. have not been confirmed until now or discussed in contemporary literature. Therefore, this review of 50 years of THA data demonstrated that hip impingement was always the trigger for adverse wear and that metal-backed cups represent the potential for release of metal debris at extremes of functional standing and sitting postures.

Highlights

  • Considerable endeavor has gone into understanding wear-related risks in total hip arthroplasty (THA)

  • The purpose of this paper is to assemble information that will demonstrate; 1) prosthetic hip impingement is commonplace in THA patients, 2) “stripe” wear is a hallmark indicator for impingement, 3) “prosthetic” impingement risks damage to metallic neck and head, 4) edge-loading during impingement releases metal particles, and 5) retrieval evidence will demonstrate that large metal particles contaminate all arthroplasty types those incorporating metal-backed acetabular cups

  • The differences between this case and our McKee-Farrar THA (MKF) retrieval raised the question, how much bearing surface does the patient habitually use, and how does that vary with THA diameter? Review of the literature and LLUMC data provided six hypotheses: 1) Head wear patterns (MWZ) are circular to mildly elliptical in polar region 2) Head MWA-ratios range up to 55% 3) Narrowest main wear zone (MWZ) margin indicates superolateral head position in-vivo 4) Centroidal-axis of head MWZ lies adjacent to stem centerline and superior to polar-axis 5) Inclination of MWZ centroidal axis corresponds to resultant hip-force (R) in-vivo 6) Polar head stripes represent edge-loading by the cup-rim LLUMC received a contemporary THA design with still-fused 50 mm head

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Considerable endeavor has gone into understanding wear-related risks in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Stripe lengths varied from 16 - 79 mm and it was noted that in 90 ̊ flexion the head stripes formed by combined retroversion of cup on head crossed the head’s polar region in the posterior direction These ceramic studies confirmed 1) stripe wear on heads (head-E/L), 2) cup-E/L, 3) impingement damage on femoral necks (neck-E/L), and 4) metallic staining as confirmation of circulating metal debris. Our 36 mm COC impingement model (Figure 3) simulates cup-rim profiles across the head for various hip positions. With hip-extension, the femoral neck impinges on the posteroinferior cup rim (lateral view), creating edge-loading on its posterior facet. The inferior view shows neck impingement on the posteroinferior cup rim and the black head stripe traverses from posteroinferior to anterosuperior. Note the red stripe representing cup-rim profile corresponding to posteroinferior edge-loading on the head This stripe corresponds to the red retroverted stripe depicted in the 36mm THA impingement model (Figure 3(d)). It is noted that this is within the theoretical CIA-impingement range (22 ̊ - 30 ̊) for 28 and 32 mm diameter heads

Ceramic-on-Ceramic Summary
Adverse Wear with Metal-on-Metal THA and RA
Summary of Metal-on-Metal Wear Patterns
Impingement Evidence in Metal-on-Metal THA
10. Summary of MOM Wear Patterns in THA and RA
Findings
11. Impingement Evidence in Metal-on-Plastic Retrievals
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call