Abstract

BackgroundRestoration with locking-taper implants is a widely used methodology. However, conical connection systems such as locking-taper implant systems have rarely been examined. This study provides a retrospective investigation of locking-taper fixed restorations, mainly focusing on prosthetic complications.MethodsPatients undergo treatment with conical connected implants from 2008 to 2010 were examined. Preparation of the implant sites was performed according to the standard procedures for the Bicon system. Bone healing took over 6 months, and the prosthetic procedure was initiated thereafter. Integrated abutment crowns or gold porcelain crowns were used, and the prosthesis type was a single crown or a fixed dental prosthesis. Once the crown was in place, its occlusion was thoroughly checked and adjusted, and then the crown was glazed or finely polished. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to calculate the cumulative complication-free rates for 5 and 10 years. Additionally, a Cox regression model was used to identify the factors that independently influenced the results. Implant survival and marginal bone loss were also investigated.ResultsA total of 392 patients who underwent 541 implants and 434 locking taper implant-based restorations from 2008 to 2010 were examined. The overall 5-year cumulative complication-free rate was 83.34%. The most common prosthetic complication was veneer chipping, with a frequency of 67.53%. According to the Cox regression model, the complication-free rate of integrated abutment crowns was significantly higher than that of gold porcelain crowns, that of molar regions was significantly higher than that of premolar regions, and that of females was significantly higher than that of males. Only three implant failures happened, and the mean marginal bone loss values at 1- year, 5-years and 10- years were 0.25 mm (95% CI ± 0.12), 0.40 mm (95% CI ± 0.03) and 0.51 mm (95% CI ± 0.05), respectively.ConclusionVeneer chipping was the most common complication with locking-taper implant-supported fixed restorations. The incidence of complications for IACs is significantly higher than that for GPCs. Age, location, and prosthesis type are not determinants of prosthetic complications. Besides, the long-term clinical effect of locking-taper implant can meet the clinical needs. The bone tissue level around the implant can maintain long-term stability.

Highlights

  • Restoration with locking-taper implants is a widely used methodology

  • Screw loosening does not necessarily lead to prosthesis failure, it can allow plaque deposits to form that result from microgaps and micromotion [6, 7], and these deposits can lead to further biological complications, such as peri-implantitis or peri-implant mucositis

  • Since the present study mainly focused on the prosthetic complications, implants that failed before prosthetic procedures started were excluded

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Conical connection systems such as locking-taper implant systems have rarely been examined. This study provides a retrospective investigation of locking-taper fixed restorations, mainly focusing on prosthetic complications. A study showed that the implant survival rate of implant supported fixed prostheses (single crowns) was satisfactory [1]. Complications arising from implant treatment are a bothersome issue for both doctors and patients [1, 2]. It has been reported that screw failure is a large concern for clinicians and patients [3]. Screw loosening does not necessarily lead to prosthesis failure, it can allow plaque deposits to form that result from microgaps and micromotion [6, 7], and these deposits can lead to further biological complications, such as peri-implantitis or peri-implant mucositis. Pure (screwless) implant systems, such as conical connection systems that are fixed by only friction, have been developed

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call