Abstract
A retrospective analysis was performed to determine the surgeon's impact on the selection of the size of prosthesis in aortic valve replacement. From January 1993 through December 1997, 748 patients underwent either isolated aortic valve replacement (530) or double valve replacement (218) with bileaflet valves. Depending on the operating surgeon, patients were divided into group A (367) or group B (381). Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables in both groups were compared. Groups A and B were identical in demographic and clinical profiles. Cardiopulmonary bypass time, ischemic time, and early and late results in both groups were similar. Significantly more patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement in group A (169; 67.9%) received a large (≥25 mm) prosthesis compared with group B (69; 24.5%). Compared with group B, a large prosthesis was used in a significantly greater proportion of all patients in group A, irrespective of etiology, predominant aortic valve lesion, and age of the patient. Overall, the operating surgeon was identified as the most important predictor (odds ratio 3.5; p < 0.0001) of use of a large valve.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
