Abstract

BackgroundProstate-specific antigen (PSA) is considered neither sensitive nor specific for prostate cancer (PCa). We aimed to compare total PSA (tPSA), percentage of free PSA (%fPSA), the PSA density (PSAD), Prostate Health Index (PHI), and the PHI density (PHID) to see which one could best predict clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa): a potentially lethal disease.MethodsA total of 412 men with PSA of 2–20 ng/mL were prospectively included. Serum biomarkers for PCa was collected before transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. PHI was calculated by the formula: (p2PSA/fPSA) x √tPSA. PHID was calculated as PHI divided by prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasound.ResultsOf the 412 men, 134 (32.5%) and 94(22.8%) were diagnosed with PCa and csPCa, respectively. We used the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and decision curve analyses (DCA) to compare the performance of PSA related parameters, PHI and PHID in diagnosing csPCa. AUC for tPSA, %fPSA, %p2PSA, PSAD, PHI and PHID were 0.56、0.63、0.76、0.74、0.77 and 0.82 respectively for csPCa detection. In the univariate analysis, the prostate volume, tPSA, %fPSA, %p2PSA, PHI, PSAD, and PHID were all significantly associated with csPCa, and PHID was the most important predictor (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.15–1.72). Besides, The AUC of PHID was significantly larger than PHI in csPCa diagnosis (p=0.004). At 90% sensitivity, PHID had the highest specificity (54.1%) for csPCa and could reduce the most unnecessary biopsies (43.7%) and miss the fewest csPCa (8.5%) when PHID ≥ 0.67. In addition to AUC, DCA re-confirmed the clinical benefit of PHID over all PSA-related parameters and PHI in csPCa diagnosis. The PHID cut-off value was positively correlated with the csPCa ratio in the PHID risk table, which is useful for evaluating csPCa risk in a clinical setting.ConclusionThe PHID is an excellent predictor of csPCa. The PHID risk table may be used in standard clinical practice to pre-select men at the highest risk of harboring csPCa.

Highlights

  • Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common malignancies in both Western and Asian countries

  • The total PSA (tPSA) level was similar between the two groups, while men with clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) had a significantly lower %free PSA (fPSA), and higher %p2PSA, Prostate Health Index (PHI), PSA density (PSAD), and PHI density (PHID)

  • TPSA failed to demonstrate significance in predicting PCa but was a predictor for csPCa. Biomarkers such as %fPSA, %p2PSA, PHI, PSAD, and PHID were all significantly associated with both PCa and csPCa

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common malignancies in both Western and Asian countries. The introduction of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test in 1987 is one of the reasons for the growing incidence of PCa. Produced by prostate epithelial cells, PSA is regarded as an organ-specific rather than a diseasespecific marker. The correlation between PSA and benign prostate hyperplasia, prostate inflammation, and PCa makes it a marker with broad clinical utility; it is a complex tool in terms of confirming the cancer diagnosis, with a 60%–70% false positive rate [1,2,3]. When to perform a prostate biopsy should be individualized and well discussed. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is considered neither sensitive nor specific for prostate cancer (PCa). We aimed to compare total PSA (tPSA), percentage of free PSA (%fPSA), the PSA density (PSAD), Prostate Health Index (PHI), and the PHI density (PHID) to see which one could best predict clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa): a potentially lethal disease

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call