Abstract

目的 探讨MR动态增强扫描(DCE-MRI)、扩散加权成像(DWI)和三维氢质子MR波谱分析(3D 1H-MRS)在前列腺癌诊断中的价值.方法经穿刺活检、手术病理或随访证实的32例前列腺癌及64例前列腺增生患者,以及29例健康志愿者经MR常规扫描、DCE-MRI、DWI和MRS扫描,分别测量前列腺癌、前列腺增生病灶和正常前列腺中央腺区和正常周围带强化后的相对信号强度值、DWI信号强度值和表观扩散系数(ADC)值,以及胆碱/枸橼酸盐(Cho/Cit)和[Cho+肌酸(Cr)]/Cit比值,并经方差分析比较不同组织和病灶间差异.结果经DCE-MRI检查,22例前列腺癌患者中18例病灶区呈早期明显强化,并快速下降;40例前列腺增生患者中38例呈早期明显强化并逐渐上升至中晚期达峰值后缓慢下降,除0及120 s两时间段前列腺癌与前列腺增生组织两者之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)外,正常周围带、增生与癌三者的相对信号强度在其余每个时段均差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).经DWI检查前列腺癌患者26例于ADC图上病灶呈明显低信号,ADC值为(104.23±26.15)×10-5mm2/s,43例前列腺增生患者病灶区平均ADC值为(175.21±64.86)×10-5mm2/s,除正常前列腺周围带与前列腺增生之间ADC值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)外,前列腺癌、前列腺增生和正常前列腺中央腺区之间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).MRS检查前列腺癌17例,其病灶区Cho/Cit比值为2.26±0.91,(Cho+Cr)/Cit比值为2.85±1.01,35例前列腺增生患者病灶区平均Cho/Cit比值为0.46±0.23,(Cho+Cr)/Cit比值为0.57±0.20.除正常前列腺周围带与正常前列腺中央腺区之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)外,前列腺癌、前列腺增生和正常前列腺组织其余各组间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).DCE-MRI、DWI和MRS 3种检查方法在前列腺癌诊断敏感度、特异度和准确度均达70%以上,而通过3种检查方法的联合应用,其敏感度、特异度和准确度分别达87.50%、94.74%、92.59%.结论DCE-MRI、DWI和MRS 3种检查方法在前列腺癌诊断中具有特征性表现,而3种检查方法的联合应用又将极大地提高MRI诊断前列腺癌的正确诊断率。

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.