Abstract
In the South African context, as well as elsewhere in sub-Saharan Africa, there is general agreement that small-plot agriculture “remains important for most rural households, mostly for domestic consumption”, and it is claimed that “people look to farming or natural resource harvesting as sources of livelihood”. Many have echoed Michael Lipton’s old call for “abandoning negative stereotypes of smallholder production, and embracing a positive view of the possibilities for land-based rural livelihoods” (Cousins 2005a; International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) 2002; New Economic Partnership for African Development (NEPAD) 2002; Commission for Africa 2005:44). Their policy conclusion is that the central thrust of anti-poverty strategy should focus on these promising possibilities for family farming by implementing a land reform that improves the access of the poor to productive assets including not only land but also micro-credit, access to inputs, marketing facilities, and extension advice. “Possibilities” are not the theme of this paper, partly because the theoretical underpinnings and flawed logic of these arguments for redistributive land reform and smallholder support have been criticised in earlier work (Sender and Johnston 2004).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.