Abstract

SummaryBackground Artificial neural networks apply non-linear statistics to pattern recognition problems. One such problem is acute myocardial infarction (AMI), a diagnosis which, in a patient presenting as an emergency, can be difficult to confirm. We report here a prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of a network and that of physicians, on the same patients with suspected AMI.Methods Emergency department physicians who evaluated 1070 patients 18 years or older presenting to the emergency department of a teaching hospital in California, USA with anterior chest pain indicated whether they thought these patients had sustained a myocardial infarction. The network analysed the patient data collected by the physicians during their evaluations and also generated a diagnosis.Findings The physicians had a diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for myocardial infarction of 73·3% (95% confidence interval 63·3-83·3%) and 81·1% (78·7-83·5%), respectively, while the network had a diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 96·0% (91·2-100%) and 96·0% (94·8-97·2%), respectively. Only 7% of patients had had an AMI, a low frequency but typical for anterior chest pain.Interpretation The application of non-linear neural computational analysis via an artificial neural network to the clinical diagnosis of myocardial infarction appears to have significant potential.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call