Abstract
Objectives: Many ED patients who have hyperkalemia (HK) with evidence of hemolysis have pseudohyperkalemia (PHK) and may not require repeat potassium (K) testing, though ED physicians often redraw levels. We sought to determine if a set of patients with PHK could be determined who would not require repeat K draws based on lab and medication/co-morbid conditions. Methods: This was a prospective IRB-approved study at an 85,000 patient/yr inner-city ED. Data was analyzed to determine whether repeat K draws were necessary in patients with HK plus hemolysis who had normal renal function (NFR) defined by either Cr or GFR and to determine factors that might lower retest threshold and prevent unnecessary repeat K testing. Normal renal function was defined as Cr < 1.3 or GFR > 60 (calculated by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation:. HK was defined as K > 5.3 mEq/L. ED patients with K draws showing HK plus hemolysis with repeat metabolic panel performed within 12 hours were eligible. Results: 300 patients had HK with hemolysis with repeat testing during the study period. Four were excluded due to missing/incomplete data. Two patients had renal failure and were excluded. 238 had repeat K sent prior to, or without specific HK treatment and were further analyzed. The median age was 60, range 76, IQR 46-75. 153/238 (64.2%) were female, 200/238 African-American (84%), 169/238 (71%) had normal GFR while 182/238 (76.8%) had normal Cr. Twenty-four of the 238 (10%) had persistent HK on the 2nd lab draw. Factors on univariate analysis associated with HK on repeat testing were age, gender, diuretic use, PVD, DM, and abnormal BUN, Cr or GFR. Binary logistic regression showed abnormal Cr, age and PVD as significant predictors of persistent HK. ROC curves of Cr and age were generated and further analysis showed Cr >1.4, age > 63, or PVD would have identified 22/24 cases of persistent hyperkalemia (the two patients showing persistent hyperkalemia had potassium levels that did not require treatment). This resulted in a decreased need for retesting in 53.7% of patients. Conclusion: By using 3 variables: Cr >1.4, age > 63, and history of PVD, 115/214 (53.7%) of patients with initial HK with hemolysis would not require repeat blood draw for potassium testing, while 2/24 patients with persistent HK would have been missed. These 2 patients had marginally elevated potassium that would not have required treatment. Since some variables reported to be associated with hyperkalemia were not present or were present in low numbers, physicians may need to repeat testing on select or sicker patients who they suspect may have true HK, however up to 50% of patients will not require such testing.
Highlights
Emergency Department patients commonly have metabolic panels performed in the course of their evaluation and treatment
Four patients were excluded due to missing/incomplete data whereas two patients were excluded for renal failure
We used the combination Cr > 1.4, presence of PVD and age > 63 to analyze the proportion of patients who would not require additional testing and the number of repeat positive hyperkalemia patients when patients with these factors were excluded. With these factors we found 22/24 patients with persistent hyperkalemia would have been identified whereas 115 of 214 patients with pseudohyperkalemia would not have required repeat testing; a decrease of 53.7%
Summary
Emergency Department patients commonly have metabolic panels performed in the course of their evaluation and treatment. Hyperkalemia is a common electrolyte abnormality found in emergency department patients with potentially lethal side effects if not treated. Pseudohyperkalemia, secondary to hemolysis, is occasionally found in patients with normal renal function and no history of renal disease or diseases affecting the kidneys. The metabolic panel is commonly repeated in patients with pseudohyperkalemia to be certain that true hyperkalemia is not present. Gupta stated that since a true positive rate of 5% for severe hyperkalemia exists with normal Cr that all patients required further testing [4].
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.