Prospective Randomized Trial of Use of In-House Prepared Low-Cost Radiopharmaceutical Versus Commercial Radiopharmaceutical for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Early Stage Invasive Breast Cancer.

Abstract

The current standard-of-care for surgical staging of the axilla in clinically node-negative (N0) early breast cancers is sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), which requires expensive radiopharmaceuticals for efficacious results. In-house produced low-cost radiopharmaceuticals may be the solution and have shown efficacy in earlier observational/pilot studies. Wecompared SLNB using in-house prepared radiopharmaceutical (99mTc-Antimony-colloid) versus commercially marketed radiopharmaceutical (99mTc-Sulphur-colloid)in this prospective randomized study. 78 clinically N0 early breast cancer patients (T1/2, N0 stages), undergoing primary surgery were prospectively randomized 1:1 into two groups; to receive SLNB using methylene blue, and either 99mTc-Antimony colloid(Group-1) or 99mTc-Sulphur colloid(Group-2). Completion axillary dissection was done in all (validation SLNB). SLNB indices were compared between the groups. The groups were comparable with regard to age, stage, tumour size, hormone receptors and HER2neu status. Cost of thein-house prepared 99mTc-antimony colloid was 16-times lesser compared to 99mTc-sulphur colloid. SLN identification rates (IR) in Groups 1 and 2 were 100 and 97.4% respectively, (p>0.05). False negative rates (FNR) in Group 1 and 2 were 6.3% (1/16 patients) and 7.7% (1/13 patients), respectively, (p>0.05). There were no major allergic reactions in either group. In this prospective randomized trial on early breast cancer patients, accuracy of SLNB was comparable using in-house prepared, 99mTc-antimony colloid and commercially marketed 99mTc-sulphur colloid as radiopharmaceutical, while 99mTc-antimony colloid was much cheaper than 99mTc-sulphur colloid.