Abstract

This prospective, non-randomized clinical trial was designed to determine the clinical outcome of patients who underwent Intradiscal Electrotherapy (IDET) for the treatment of chronic discogenic low back pain. Twenty-seven consecutive patients undergoing IDET were prospectively evaluated. All patients, as determined by provocative discography and/or MRI, had discogenic disease with chronic low back pain and were non-responsive to conservative treatment for at least 6 months. The mean pre-operative duration of symptoms was 38 months. The American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons Joint Section Lumbar Disc Herniation Study Questionnaire, which includes the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Short Form (SF) -36 Health Status Questionnaire, was used. The follow-up endpoint for all patients was one year. Seventy-five percent of patients improved based upon the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire while only 48% of patients were found to improve on the SF-36 Survey. The SF-36 Bodily Pain Subscale did improve relative to other subscales in 52% of patients. There was no relationship found between outcome and duration of symptoms (p= .32), number of levels treated (p= .20), or worker's compensation (p= .38). There were no complications that resulted from the IDET treatment. IDET was found to be effective in 75% of patients in improving their chronic low back pain. This did not translate into a significant improvement in the SF-36 survey scores. The risks are negligible, and recovery time is minimal. The procedure may be useful in selected patients who would otherwise undergo an interbody fusion procedure.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.