Abstract

BackgroundLiving with an untreated cancer may alter quality of life (QoL) in the long term. ObjectiveTo prospectively study long-term changes in general, mental, and physical QoL in a contemporary active surveillance (AS) patient cohort with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa). Design, setting, and participantsThe study population consisted of patients enrolled in the PRIAS trial in Helsinki University Hospital (n = 348). The RAND-36 questionnaire was used to assess general QoL at the start of AS and at 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 years during follow-up. Patients who had undergone robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP; n = 88) also received the questionnaire after treatment. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisChanges over time were analysed using multilevel mixed-effects regression models, and reported as the mean and95% confidence interval. A rule of 0.5 × standard deviation was used to estimate changes of clinical importance. Results and limitationsMedian follow-up until the end of AS or last follow-up was 7.2 (range 0.3−12.7) yr. A decrease was observed in six of eight QoL subdomains at 7 yr. However, all scores were above age-stratified reference values. There was no difference between the group who continued AS throughout the study period and the group who discontinued AS and underwent RALP. More than half of the study cohort discontinued AS (n = 198; 57%), 135 men (68%) because of events specified in the protocol and only seven (3.5%) because of anxiety. Metastatic disease developed in six patients (1.7%), and two cases (0.6%) of PCa-related death were recorded among 348 patients in more than 12 yr of overall follow-up. The lack of a randomised control population is a limitation of the study. ConclusionsContemporary protocolised AS does not impair general QoL. Men undergoing a treatment change (RALP) did not experience a decrease in QoL before or after their treatment change. Patient summaryActive surveillance is a safe treatment option for men with low-risk prostate cancer. We show that this follow-up strategy does not cause a decline in patients’ general quality of life.

Highlights

  • The incidence of prostate cancer (PCa) has increased during recent years, mainly because of the widespread use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing

  • The same cohort has been followed for more than 15 yr and the results demonstrate that active surveillance (AS) is a safe and feasible option for low-risk and some selected intermediaterisk PCa cases

  • Of all the Helsinki PRIAS patients, 13 were lost to follow up, nine of whom moved to another city or country; only seven

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The incidence of prostate cancer (PCa) has increased during recent years, mainly because of the widespread use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing. The same cohort has been followed for more than 15 yr and the results demonstrate that AS is a safe and feasible option for low-risk and some selected intermediaterisk PCa cases. AS seems to be a safe treatment option for patients with low-risk PCa and is recommended by most of the guidelines. Objective: To prospectively study long-term changes in general, mental, and physical QoL in a contemporary active surveillance (AS) patient cohort with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa). Patient summary: Active surveillance is a safe treatment option for men with low-risk prostate cancer. We show that this follow-up strategy does not cause a decline in patients’ general quality of life

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.