Prospective Electrocardiogram-Gated Axial 64-Detector Computed Tomographic Angiography vs Retrospective Gated Helical Technique to Assess Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Anastomosis: - Comparison of Image Quality and Patient Radiation Dose -

Abstract

In the present study the effective dose and image quality at distal anastomoses were retrospectively compared between prospective electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated axial and retrospective ECG-gated helical techniques on 64-detector computed tomographic (CT) angiography following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Following bypass surgery, 52 patients with a heart rate <65 beats/min underwent CT angiography: 26 patients each with prospective and retrospective ECG gating techniques. The effective dose was compared between the 2 groups using a 4-point scale (4, excellent; 1, poor) to grade the quality of curved multiplanar reformation images at distal anastomoses. Patient characteristics of the 2 groups were well matched, and the same CT scan parameters were used for both, except for the interval between surgery and CT examination, tube current, and image noise index. Image quality scores did not differ significantly (3.26+/-0.95 vs 3.35+/-0.87; P=0.63), but the effective dose was significantly lower in the prospective (7.3+/-1.8 mSv) than in the retrospective gating group (23.6+/-4.5 mSv) (P<0.0001). Following bypass surgery, 64-detector CT angiography using prospective ECG gating is superior to retrospective gating in limiting the radiation dose and maintaining the image quality of distal anastomoses.