Abstract

Abstract This study implemented feature-selection methods for prospective elderly fall-risk prediction and compared modeling outcomes to retrospective fall occurrence classification. Seventy-five elderly adults without prior falls (75.2 (6.6) years; 47 non-fallers, 28 fallers based on 6 month prospective falls) walked 7.62 m while wearing F-Scan insoles and tri-axial accelerometers at the left and right shanks, pelvis, and head. Feature sets were reduced using Relief-F, correlation-based feature selection, and fast correlation based filter algorithms. Naive Bayesian, multi-layer perceptron neural network, and support vector machine (SVM) classifiers were used for faller prediction. The top twenty feature selection-based models and top ten all-variable-based models determined by single 75:25 train:test stratified holdouts were further examined by training 10,000 models with randomized 75:25 train:test stratified holdouts. Model evaluation parameters were averaged across all 10,000 models and then ranked. Feature selection increased predictive accuracy by 9%, comparing models with and without feature selection. The increase in accuracy was greater than for retrospective faller classification using feature selection. Based on the 10,000 randomized holdouts, the highest ranked model had 65% accuracy and 59% sensitivity, achieved by a pressure-sensing-insole and left-shank-accelerometer based feature subset. The best performance without feature selection was 56% accuracy and 42% sensitivity. Feature selection improved model performance and should therefore be included as a model development step for elderly fall-risk prediction. Some model performance results, such as Relief-F providing the best feature selection and high single-sensor performance using the lower-back accelerometer, were consistent for prospective faller prediction and retrospective classification. However, other contributions to high model performance, such as dual-task assessment for single-sensor models and use of SVM, were specific to older adult fall-risk prediction based on prospective fall occurrence.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.