Abstract

Background Ventricular dysfunction in patients with a single right ventricle (SRV) or as ingle left ventricle (SLV) is a known risk factor for morbidity and mortality. However, the differences in SRV and SLV function remain poorly understood, with only a few studies performed1-3. In this study, we measure the strain using cardiac MRI and perform comprehensive comparison of the global and regional strain in both the circumferential (ecc) and longitudinal (eL) dimension. Purpose: In normal subjects and asymptomatic patients with SLV and SRV after total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC), compare: 1) Global ecc and eL strain, 2) Regional circumferential and longitudinal strains at free wall (ecc-free, eL-free) and septum (ecc-sept, eL-sept), 3) ecc and eL across the ventricle from apex to base. Methods We performed a prospective analysis of 18 subjects (7 normal age: 11.8 +/- 3; 6 SRV age: 11.4 +/- 2.3; 5 SLV age: 12.7 +/- 4.2). Acquisition Protocol: Strain information was acquired at three short axis slices at basal, mid-cavity, and apical locations in all 18 subjects in a 1.5T MRI scanner (Philips Acheiva) using: a) Complementary Spatial Modulation of Magnetization (CSPAMM)4 images: Used for generating ecc; and b) Fast-Strain Encoded (fSENC)5 images: Used for generating eL. Data Analysis: ecc and eL across all cardiac phases and slices were calculated from SAX slices using DiagnosoftTM. The ventricular regions at each slice were assigned based upon the AHA 16 segment model. ecc-sept, eL-sept, ecc-free, and eL-free were also calculated for each slice and compared. Results

Highlights

  • Ventricular dysfunction in patients with a single right ventricle (SRV) or a single left ventricle (SLV) is a known risk factor for morbidity and mortality

  • Significant reduction seen in global εcc at mid and basal locations of both SLV and SRV patients (Figure 2). 2

  • Significant reduction seen in global εL in apical locations of SLV and SRV patients

Read more

Summary

Background

Ventricular dysfunction in patients with a single right ventricle (SRV) or a single left ventricle (SLV) is a known risk factor for morbidity and mortality. The differences in SRV and SLV function remain poorly understood, with only a few studies performed[1,2,3]. We measure the strain using cardiac MRI and perform comprehensive comparison of the global and regional strain in both the circumferential (εcc) and longitudinal (εL) dimension. Purpose: In normal subjects and asymptomatic patients with SLV and SRV after total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC), compare: 1) Global εcc and εL strain, 2) Regional circumferential and longitudinal strains at free wall (εcc-free, εL-free) and septum (εcc-sept, εL-sept), 3) εcc and εL across the ventricle from apex to base

Methods
Results
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call