Abstract

This prospective study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of diffusion weighted MRI (DW-MRI) to FDG PET-CT in the detection of local recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinomas after (chemo)radiation ((C)RT). The institutional ethical committee approved this study and all patients signed written informed consent. Seventy-five patients clinically suspected of local recurrence after (C)RT for laryngeal, hypopharyngeal or oropharyngeal cancer underwent a DW-MRI and an FDG PET-CT. Qualitative assessment of DW-MRI and FDG PET-CT was performed independently by a blinded experienced radiologist and a nuclear medicine physician respectively. Reference standard was the absence of biopsy proven local recurrence within 6 months following imaging. Seventy patients were suitable for analysis. Fifty percent (35/70) had local recurrence. Seventy-three percent (51/70) of the FDG PET-CTs were positive compared to 46% (32/70) of the DW-MRI. FDG PET-CT had an area under the curve 0.71 compared to 0.73 for MR-DWI (P = 0.85). The sensitivity of FDG PET-CT was 97% compared to 69% for DW-MRI (P = <0.01). The specificity of FDG PET-CT was 77% compared to 46% for DW-MRI (P = <0.01). DW-MRI showed similar diagnostic accuracy, superior specificity but inferior sensitivity compared to FDG PET-CT. False negative results will cause delay in the detection of a recurrence and this will potentially influence the chance of successful salvage surgery. Therefore, based on these results, we consider FDG PET-CT to be superior to MR-DWI for the detection of early recurrent oropharyngeal, hypopharyngeal or laryngeal cancer after (chemo)radiation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.