Prospective comparative analysis of oncologic and functional outcomes between focal therapy and robotic radical prostatectomy.

Abstract

90 Background: Focal therapy (FT) is an emerging treatment alternative for organ-confined Prostate cancer (PCa). The aim is to perform a non-randomized prospective analysis to compare oncological, functional and morbidity outcomes after FT and robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP). Methods: From July 2009 to September 2015, 1883 patients underwent RARP and 373 FT. Of those, we selected 1410 men (1222 RARP and 236 FT) according to the NCCN PCa risk classification: 402(27.5%),388(26.6%) and 668(45.8%) patients were very low risk, low risk and intermediate risk, respectively. Within FT, 188 men underwent focal high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and 48 cryotherapy. Oncologic outcomes were analyzed in terms of biochemical recurrence (BCR) free survival (Phoenix definition for FT, and PSA >0.2 ng/dl in RARP), and the need for further treatment. FT failure was defined as any positive control biopsy after treatment. Overall suvival and metastasis free survival were estimated using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier methods. Complications were graded as Clavien-Dindo classification. Functional outcomes were assessed with validated questionnaries for genitourinary symptoms and sexual function. Results: Median follow-up was 45.4 mo (IQR: 25.3-65.5). BCR-free survival was comparable among RARP and FT ( 10.6% RARP vs 9% FT, p 0.69). Patients with intermediate risk PCa were significantly associated with BCR in both groups (HR 8.47;95% CI 4.57-15.71; p< 0.001). In FT group positive biopsy in the treated lobe was seen in 42(17.7%) men. No differences were found in overall survival, neither mestastases free survival between treatments; (p 0.85 and p 0.142 respectively). FT was associated with higher risk of further treatments (HR 5.21; 95% CI 3.7-7.35; p <0.001). FT had higher rates of complications (15.3% vs 9% for RARP, p 0.004). RARP was associated with less continence recovery vs FT at 3, 6 and 12 mo (p <0.001). Potency is higher between FT men at 3,6 and 12 mo (<p 0.001). Conclusions: For selected patients with organ confined PCa, RARP and FT offered comparable oncological control with FT requiring higher additional treatments. Potency and continency appears to be better preserved in FT patients.