Abstract

Although the role of adiponectin and leptin in the etiology of metabolic syndrome (MetS) has been explored in various populations, limited knowledge is available on the prospective association of adiponectin and leptin with the risk of MetS development. The present study aimed to evaluate the associations of adiponectin, leptin, and the leptin-adiponectin (LA) ratio with the future risk of MetS in middle-aged and older Korean adults. Using a prospective, population-based Ansan-Ansung cohort of the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES), 2691 Korean adults (1317 men and 1374 women) were included in the present study. Serum adiponectin and leptin concentrations were measured using commonly available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to investigate the relationships of the different adiponectin and leptin concentrations and LA ratio with the incident MetS. During a mean follow-up of 6.75 years, a total of 359 (27.26%) men and 385 (28.02%) women were identified as developing new-onset MetS. After controlling for covariates, higher adiponectin levels were associated with lower incidence of MetS (hazard ratio (HR) for third vs. first tertile: 0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.40–0.70 for men and HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.42–0.71 for women), while higher leptin levels (HR for third vs. first tertile: 2.88, 95% CI: 2.01–4.13 for men and HR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.13–2.13 for women) and LA ratio (HR for third vs. first tertile: 3.07, 95% CI: 2.13–4.44 for men and HR: 1.94, 95% CI: 1.41–2.66 for women) were associated with an increased incidence of MetS. Among men, in the fully adjusted models an increase by one standard deviation (SD) in adiponectin levels was associated with a 10% decrease in MetS risk (HR per SD: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.85–0.95) while leptin and LA ratio was associated with a 5% (HR per SD: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01–1.08) and 40% (HR per SD: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.22–1.62) increase in MetS risk, respectively. Among women, a significant association with MetS risk was observed only in adiponectin levels (HR per SD: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.88–0.95). We found that higher adiponectin level was associated with a lower risk of MetS, while higher leptin level and LA ratio were associated with elevated MetS incidence, irrespective of body mass index at baseline in both Korean men and women. Adiponectin and leptin levels and LA ratio could play a role as a useful biomarker in the prediction of future MetS development among middle-aged and older Koreans.

Highlights

  • In contrast to three or four decades ago when infectious diseases were the main cause of death, the healthcare burden from non-communicable diseases (NCDs) continues to rise worldwide [1]

  • We found that higher adiponectin level was associated with a lower risk of metabolic syndrome (MetS), while higher leptin level and LA ratio were associated with elevated MetS incidence, irrespective of body mass index at baseline in both Korean men and women

  • Baseline characteristics of study participants according to tertiles of adiponectin and leptin are shown in Supplementary Tables S1 and S2, respectively

Read more

Summary

Methods

We used data from a prospective, population-based Ansan-Ansung cohort study, part of the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES) conducted by the Korea National Institute of Health (KNIH). 10,030 Korean adults aged 40–69 years were recruited from two Korean cities (Ansan and Ansung), and were followed up biennially over a 14-year period. Detailed study design and procedures of the Ansan-Ansung cohort study have been previously published [24]. The KNIH identified 15 biomarkers, including adiponectin and leptin, using the stored blood samples obtained from individuals who participated in the third follow-up examination. Since the third follow-up examination provided information on serum adiponectin and leptin levels, we performed the analysis by considering this data as the baseline. 6688 people participated in the third follow-up examination between 2007 and 2008, among whom 1100 were excluded due to an absence of

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call