Abstract

Structured abstractIntroductionProspective and retrospective performance assessment of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADASs) is fundamental to pilot future enhancements for active safety devices. In critical road scenarios between two vehicles where ADAS activation enables collision mitigation only, currently available assessment methodologies rely on the reconstruction of the impact phase consequent to the specific intervention on braking and steering: the velocity change sustained by the vehicle in the collision (Delta V) is retrieved, so that IR decrease for the vehicle occupants can be obtained by appropriate Injury Risk (IR) models. However, information regarding the ADAS performance is available only after the impact phase reconstruction and not just as when the criticality occurs in the pre-impact phase: the best braking and steering alternative cannot be immediately envisaged, since a direct correlation lacks between the braking/steering intervention and IR.MethodThis work highlights an ADAS performance assessment method based on the disaggregation of Delta V in the two pre-impact parameters closing velocity at collision (V_r) and impact eccentricity, represented by the Crash Momentum Index (CMI). Such a disaggregation leads to the determination of IR based solely on impact configuration between the vehicles, without directly considering the impact phase. The performance of diverse ADASs in terms of intervention logic are directly comparable based on the resulting impact configuration, associated with a single coordinate in the CMI-V_r plane and a sole IR value as a consequence.ResultsThe CMI-V_r approach is employable for both purposes of prospective and retrospective performance assessment of ADAS devices. To illustrate the advantages of the methodology, a solution for prospective assessment based on the CMI-V_r plane is initially proposed and applied to case studies: this provides direct suggestions regarding the most appropriate interventions on braking and steering for IR minimization, fundamental in the tuning or development phase of an ADAS. A method for retrospective assessment is ultimately contextualized in the EuroNCAP “Car-to-Car Rear moving” test for an Inter-Urban Autonomous Emergency Braking system, a device implemented on a significant portion of the circulating fleet.ConclusionsBased on the evidenced highlights, it is demonstrated that the approach provides complementary information compared to well-established performance assessment methodologies in all stages of an ADAS life cycle, by suggesting a direct physical connection in the pre-impact phase between the possible ADAS interventions and the foreseeable injury outcomes.

Highlights

  • Prospective and retrospective performance assessment of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADASs) is fundamental to pilot future enhancements for active safety devices

  • A method for retrospective assessment is contextualized in the EuroNCAP “Car-to-Car Rear moving” test for an Inter-Urban Autonomous Emergency Braking system, a device implemented on a significant portion of the circulating fleet

  • The illustrated ADAS performance evaluation approach provides for the disaggregation of V into the two pre-impact parameters closing speed at the collision instant (V r ) and impact eccentricity (Crash Momentum Index, CMI), enabling evaluation of ADAS performance already in a phase preceding the crash: the intervention of the system on steering and braking modifies both these parameters, so that the ADAS performance can be assessed before the impact occurs in terms of V and Injury Risk (IR) for the occupants of the involved vehicles

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Prospective and retrospective performance assessment of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADASs) is fundamental to pilot future enhancements for active safety devices. The enhancement in road safety at the vehicle level has been initially sought through the increase in its resistance to impacts (crashworthiness), subsequently by unfolding passive protection systems, and through the development of active safety devices. This trend is part of the consolidated scheme [1] according to which the reduction of injuries on the road can be favored through the pursuit of three diverse objectives: the reduction of the number of accidents, the reduction of Injury Risk (IR) at a given impact severity and the reduction of impact severity. A system like the AEB, intervening directly on the vehicle speed (longitudinal deceleration), frequently leads to impact avoidance [4]; the principle of emergency braking is exploited by certain ADASs such as pedestrian/bike assist to promote the safety of numerous categories of vulnerable road users [5]; devices as the Lane Keeping Assist intervene on the degree of steering of the vehicle (transverse acceleration) to prevent the risk of involuntary insertion into adjacent lanes [6]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call