Abstract

Levy and Wiener (J Risk Uncertain 16(2), 147–163, 1998), Levy and Levy (Manage Sci 48(10), 1334–1349, 2002; Rev Fin Stud 17(4), 1015–1041, 2004) develop the prospect and Markowitz stochastic dominance theory with S-shaped and reverse S-shaped utility functions for investors. In this paper, we extend their work on prospect stochastic dominance theory (PSD) and Markowitz stochastic dominance theory (MSD) to the first three orders and link the corresponding S-shaped and reverse S-shaped utility functions to the first three orders. We also provide experiments to illustrate each case of the MSD and PSD to the first three orders and demonstrate that the higher order MSD and PSD cannot be replaced by the lower order MSD and PSD. Furthermore, we formulate the following PSD and MSD properties: hierarchy exists in both PSD and MSD relationships; arbitrage opportunities exist in the first orders of both PSD and MSD; and for any two prospects under certain conditions, their third order MSD preference will be ‘the opposite of’ or ‘the same as’ their counterpart third order PSD preference. By extending the work of Levy and Wiener and Levy and Levy, we provide investors with more tools to identify the first and third order PSD and MSD prospects and thus they could make wiser choices on their investment decision.

Highlights

  • Economic analyses of decisions made by different kinds of investors under uncertainty can be graphically presented by functions

  • We modify the examples used in Levy and Levy to illustrate each case of the extended Prospect Stochastic Dominance (PSD) and Markowitz Stochastic Dominance theory (MSD) of the first three orders and show that the higher order MSD and PSD cannot be replaced by the lower order MSD and PSD

  • We provide experiments to illustrate each case of the MSD and PSD to the first three orders and demonstrate that the higher order MSD and PSD cannot be replaced by the lower order MSD and PSD

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Economic analyses of decisions made by different kinds of investors under uncertainty can be graphically presented by functions. For example, Swalm (1966), Kahneman and Tversky (1979), Kahneman et al (1990), and Barberis et al (2001) suggest that the prospect theory violates the expected utility theory as the convexity of the value function on the positive domain is different from that on the negative domain.

Definitions and Notations
Theory
Illustration
F1P GP1 GF1P F2P
Concluding Remarks
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call