Prosody-driven syntax learning is robust to impoverished pitch and spectral cues.

Abstract

Across languages, prosodic boundaries tend to align with syntactic boundaries, and both infant and adult language learners capitalize on these correlations to jump-start syntax acquisition. However, it is unclear which prosodic cues-pauses, final-syllable lengthening, and/or pitch resets across boundaries-are necessary for prosodic bootstrapping to occur. It is also unknown how syntax acquisition is impacted when listeners do not have access to the full range of prosodic or spectral information. These questions were addressed using 14-channel noise-vocoded (spectrally degraded) speech. While pre-boundary lengthening and pauses are well-transmitted through noise-vocoded speech, pitch is not; overall intelligibility is also decreased. In two artificial grammar experiments, adult native English speakers showed a similar ability to use English-like prosody to bootstrap unfamiliar syntactic structures from degraded speech and natural, unmanipulated speech. Contrary to previous findings that listeners may require pitch resets and final lengthening to co-occur if no pause cue is present, participants in the degraded speech conditions were able to detect prosodic boundaries from lengthening alone. Results suggest that pitch is not necessary for adult English speakers to perceive prosodic boundaries associated with syntactic structures, and that prosodic bootstrapping is robust to degraded spectral information.