Abstract

We argue that Brazilian Portuguese (BP) affixes can be divided in (at least) two groups according to their prosodic behavior: true affixes are prosodically integrated to the base, while compositional affixes are considered independent prosodic words. Aiming to find empirical evidence to sustain this distintion, we investigate two questions: (i) Can we find acoustic patterns in derived words to differentiate true and compositional affixes? (ii) Are there psycholinguistic evidence to sustain that these two groups are accessed differently in our lexicon?. In order to answer these questions, we developed two experimental paradigms. The first one is an acoustic analysis which compares duration in syllables and V-V units of derived words. In this experiment, syllables showed increase in duration towards the stressed position for all conditions, while V-V units seem to differentiate the two types of morphological formations. The second one is an eye tracking experiment with lexical decision task to describe fixations, saccades and level of accuracy in derived words and nonce words. Our main results show that compositional words presented longer total time of fixation in the eye tracking analysis and longer and less accurate answers in the lexical decision task, what sustains the hypothesis that the two categories behave differently.

Highlights

  • True affixes do not present any level of autonomy

  • The questions which are investigated are two: (i) Can we find acoustic patterns in derived words – in special, duration – to differentiate true and compositional affixes? (ii) Are there psycholinguistic evidence to sustain that these two groups are accessed differently in our lexicon? Our hypothesis is that words derived by true affixes present characteristics of only one prosodic word – longer syllable in the stressed position (MASSINI, 1991; CANTONI, 2013), whereas words derived by compositional affixes present two prominences – one in the base and one in the affix

  • 2.1 Processes and characteristics to identify prosodic words in Brazilian Portuguese (BP) Based on previous works, we present below each of the criteria that may serve for the distinction between true and compositional affixes, followed by its explanation and an exercise of analysis with different affixes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

True affixes do not present any level of autonomy. Compositional affixes, on the other hand, are attached to the stem/word (instead of the root) and tend to exhibit less morphosemantic dependence on the base, in addition to not being subject to several phonological processes proper to true affixes. Our main results show that the processing of words with compositional affixes requires more activity than the true ones, since in this condition the participants presented more time and less accuracy to complete the tasks. Based on the assumption that prosodic words can be smaller than morphosyntactic words (NESPOR; VOGEL, 1986), we assume that compositional affixes behave as prosodic words This classification is attested by morphological characteristics of the affixes and by processes which only apply in the prosodic word. These processes and characteristics will be commented and exemplified in the subsection

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call