Pros and cons of perfusion balloons in failed angioplasty.

Abstract

Prolonged inflation with perfusion balloons is commonly used in failed angioplasty. The objective of this study was to determine the angiographic outcome of 59 consecutive patients treated with prolonged inflation with perfusion balloons as the primary treatment for failed angioplasty. Angiographic success (< 50% stenosis and normal flow) was achieved in 41%. Angiographic success was greater in the left anterior descending coronary artery (67% versus 33% for non-left anterior descending involvement, P = .044) and was less in complex dissections (25% versus 75% for no dissection or simple dissections, P = .025). Angiographic deterioration occurred in 37.5% of the successful group and 77% of the unsuccessful group (P = .002) and was more frequent in the right coronary artery (88% versus 50% for non-right coronary involvement, P = .007) and complex dissections (92% versus 38% for no dissection or simple dissections, P = .0001). Thus, in a group of patients with unsuccessful outcome following conventional balloon angioplasty, success with the perfusion balloon was modest. Furthermore, angiographic deterioration was frequently observed following unsuccessful prolonged inflation.