Abstract

At least since the advent of motor psychophysics in the 1890s, there has been considerable interest in the role of proprioceptive information in motor control, and whether different classes of movements use such information in fundamentally distinct ways. In his classic 1899 monograph, Woodworm had some difficulty distinguishing between the contribution of exteroceptive and proprioceptive inputs to motor control. He noted that “any sense whatever may conceivably serve as the sensory basis for controlling the extent of a movement.” However, it is apparent from Woodworm’s discussions that muscular sense is one of the more important senses that humans use for movement control. Despite a wealth of clinical and experimental observations indicating the general significance of proprioceptors (i.e., muscle spindles, Golgi tendon organs, and tactile afferents) in motor performance, there remains some doubt about the exact contribution of these receptors to movement. That is, do certain classes of afferents contribute special regulation to certain movements?KeywordsMotor ControlProprioceptive InputGolgi Tendon OrganMotor Unit DischargeMotor Unit Discharge RateThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.