Abstract

SUMMARYIn order to improve the efficiency of tube‐type structures in tall buildings, a new structural system, called hexagrid, is introduced in this paper. In comparison with diagrid system, it consists of multiple hexagonal grids on the face of the building. In this research, a set of structures using diagrid system having four various diagonal angles and hexagrid system were designed on a strength and stiffness‐based approach for buildings with 30, 50, 70 and 90 stories to withstand wind load. The impact of different geometric configurations of structural members on the maximum lateral displacement and architectural performance in both diagrid and hexagrid systems is compared. The stiffness sensitivity using a similar interior bracing system in both systems is also discussed. In this study, the seismic performance of a 30‐story diagrid structure and a hexagrid structure was evaluated using nonlinear static and dynamic analyses. According to the results, the hexagrid system has a better architectural view and more ductility and stiffness sensitivity, which are about three times than that of the diagrid system. And finally, in comparison with the diagrid system, the hexagrid system has enough potential to push the height limit. The guidelines discussed here are for architectural and structural engineers to improve freehand design. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call