Abstract
Present work is aimed at validation of existing popular cyclic plasticity material models and proposing an improved model for SA 333 Gr. 6 material. Recently reported in-house axial-torsion tests have been used for validation. Present analyses considered Chaboche’s non-linear kinematic hardening rule, Tanaka’s fourth order tensor and Meggiolaro’s non-proportionality considerations. The Chaboche-Tanaka-Meggiolaro model resulted in comparable assessments for stabilized loops under uniaxial, proportional and few non-proportional conditions. However, the axial stress response under most of non-proportional conditions was significantly under-predicted. The proposed modification in dynamic recovery term of kinematic hardening rule resulted in improved assessments for nearly all strain paths.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
