Abstract
This article discusses a proposal applying an earmarking tax scheme to PBB-P2 in DKI Jakarta Province to support financing and flood disaster management, based on the flood disaster that always occurs every year and has many losses. In addition, the current pattern of financing comes from the APBD or local general fund. This scheme will trigger the potential for discontinuity of budget allocations for flood disaster management. This study aims to identify and compare the practice of financing and handling disasters in other countries. Then it aims to see the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed proposal and explore the policy recommendations that can be given if this proposal is later implemented. By using a qualitative approach, this research is done through in-depth interviews and literature study. The study results found that, there are two financing schemes for flood disaster management, namely (1) national budget and (2) other government funds. Another finding shows that the proposed application of the earmarking tax can legally be carried out in DKI Jakarta. Although, there are advantages and disadvantages, and there are several options for the DKI Jakarta Provincial Government that can be considered if this proposal is later implemented.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
