Abstract

Eccentrically Braced Frames (EBFs) are widely used seismic-resisting systems, as they allow both strength and stiffness to be optimised while providing good ductility capacity. However, in theory they have a low damage threshold in severe earthquakes and post-earthquake repair of conventional EBFs will be difficult and expensive.
 This paper presents the Numerical Integration Time-History (NITH) analysis of two ten storey EBF buildings; one with a conventional active link and the other with a new form of low damage active link based on rotational sliding bolted plates. The low damage active link can be designed to allow rotation only, or to allow both rotation and axial extension. The conventional active link response in terms of displacement, rotation and inelastic demand was well within the range of the rotational active links under the records considered. The analysis shows that average maximum displacement of the building and rotation of the link for both the rotational and the rotational+extension active links was almost identical. The extension of the rotational active link permitting axial extension was less than 1.5 mm. Axial load demands on the collector beams and braces were similar in the case all three active links.
 It can be concluded from the analysis that the rotational active link with extension is not required, as the lateral extensions can be accommodated within the rotational plates with nominal clearances in the bolt holes to accommodate the lateral extension.

Highlights

  • The Eccentrically Braced Frames (EBFs) is a steel-framed earthquake resisting system for multi-storey buildings which are designed for the highest level of ductile demand.It is one of the most widely used multi-storey steel seismicresisting systems in New Zealand and many other first world seismically active countries, as it allows for both strength and stiffness to be optimised in a system that delivers dependable inelastic response and takes up little building useable space in plan or elevation

  • The analysis shows that the maximum average horizontal displacement of the ten storey building with three different types of link is similar as shown in Figure 6 and within design lateral displacement; the displacement in the case of conventional active link is slightly lower than rotational active link

  • This paper describes the concept behind a low damage form of active link for eccentrically braced frames and analytical analyses on a ten storey building with built in conventional and rotational active link to undertake initial proof of concept

Read more

Summary

SUMMARY

Braced Frames (EBFs) are widely used seismic-resisting systems, as they allow both strength and stiffness to be optimised while providing good ductility capacity. In theory they have a low damage threshold in severe earthquakes and post-earthquake repair of conventional EBFs will be difficult and expensive. Axial load demands on the collector beams and braces were similar in the case all three active links It can be concluded from the analysis that the rotational active link with extension is not required, as the lateral extensions can be accommodated within the rotational plates with nominal clearances in the bolt holes to accommodate the lateral extension

INTRODUCTION
PERFORMANCE OF EXISTING EBF SYSTEMS
PROPOSED ROTATIONAL ACTIVE LINKS OF THE NEW EBF CONCEPT
FEASABILITY STUDY OF ROTATIONAL ACTIVE LINK AND CONVENTIONAL ACTIVE LINK
THE DESIGN OF THE CONVENTIONAL AND ROTATIONAL ACTIVE LINK
ANALYSIS OF THE ROTATIONAL ACTIVE LINK
Storey Level
EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH PROGRAMS
EFFECT OF FLOOR SLAB ON EBF BEHAVIOUR
FINITE ELEMENT MODELLING TO EXTEND EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
Findings
CONCLUSIONS AND OUTCOME OF
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.