Abstract
The present study concentrates on the proposals for the strategy of the USA hegemony on cyberspace and the rejection of cyber hegemony by both the international and regional strategies. As a result, the interaction and the importance increased and we want to find an answer to the essential following questioning: Is it possible for the US strategy to dominate cyberspace without any rejection or argument with international and regional powers? Therefore, light has been shed on the present problem concerning the dynamic relationship between the US strategy and the interconnected international and regional strategies which might cause real conflict and collision. In order to find a solution for this problem, we have adopted the following hypothesis: The more US hegemony of the cyberspace increases, the more intense the arguments with international and regional strategies increase. In order to achieve a future vision for the conflicting US strategy internationally and regionally the analytical approach has been used. This approach analyzes the US cyber strategic paths in cyberspace and the consequences of cyberspace hegemony invoked in this study taking into consideration the arguments and the proposals in this study besides the most important regional and international cyber strategies.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
