Proposal of a revised International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer grading system in pulmonary non-mucinous adenocarcinoma: The importance of the lepidic proportion

Abstract

ObjectivesWe aimed to measure the validity of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) grading system in Korean patients and propose a modification for an increase of its predictability, especially in grade 2 patients. Materials and MethodsFrom 2012 to 2017, histopathologic characteristics of 1358 patients with invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma (stage I–III) from two institutions were retrospectively reviewed and re-classified according to the IASLC grading system. Considering the amount of the lepidic proportion, the validity of the revised model (Lepidic-10), derived from the training cohort (hospital A), was measured using the validation cohort (hospital B). Its predictability was compared to that of the IASLC system. ResultsOf the 1358 patients, 259 had a recurrence, and 189 died during follow-up. The Harrell’s concordance index and area under the curve of the IASLC system were 0.685 and 0.699 for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and 0.669 and 0.679 for death, respectively. From the training cohort, the IASLC grade 2 patients were divided into grades 2a and 2b (Lepidic-10 model) with a 10 % lepidic pattern. This new model further distinguished patients in both institutions that had better performance than the IASLC grading (Hospital A, p < 0.001 for RFS and death; Hospital B, p = 0.0215 for RFS, p = 0.0429 for death). ConclusionThe IASLC grading system was easily applicable; its clinical use in predicting the prognosis of Korean patients with pulmonary adenocarcinoma was validated. Furthermore, the introduction of the lepidic proportion as an additional criterion to differentiate grade 2 patients improved its predictability.