Abstract
Background: The objective of this study was to compare the facial pattern according to Steiner’s cephalometric analysis with other facial measurement methods (Ricketts, Björk-Jarabak, and McNamara). Methods: 200 patients from a university orthodontic clinic were studied. Measurements were taken using Ricketts, Steiner, Björk-Jarabak, and McNamara methods. Results were compared using standard deviation proportions. Results: Significant differences were found between Steiner’s method and the gold standard. No differences were observed between mixed and permanent dentition groups. Errors were noted in facial type classification: 54.8% in the brachyfacial group, 80% in the mesofacial group and 14.5% in the dolichofacial group. Conclusion: The mandibular angle of Steiner tends to make a diagnosis more towards the dolichofacial type compared to other methods. A protocol is proposed to adjust the value of the mandibular angle of Steiner to the other three methods in a Spanish population.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
