Abstract

False negative culture results in periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) are not uncommon particularly when patients have received long term antibiotics. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has a lower specificity partly due to detection of residual DNA from dead bacteria. Propidium monoazide (PMA) prevents DNA from dead bacteria from being amplified during the PCR. This study aimed to determine the role of PMA in PCR for diagnosis of PJI. Clinical samples were tested by PCR with and without prior treatment with PMA and compared to conventional microbiological culture. The PCR assay included genus-specific primers for staphylococci and enterococci and species-specific primers for Cutibacterium acnes. The validated conditions of PMA treatment used in this study were 20 μM concentration and 5 and 10 min of dark incubation and photo-activation respectively. 202 periprosthetic tissues and explanted prostheses from 60 episodes in 58 patients undergoing revision arthroplasties for either PJI or non-infective causes were tested, by culture, PCR, and PMA-PCR. 14 of the 60 episodes satisfied the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria for PJI and 46 did not. Sensitivity of culture, PCR, and PMA-PCR were 50%, 71%, and 79% respectively. Specificities were 98%, 72%, and 89% respectively. All figures were calculated for episodes rather than samples. PMA-PCR enhanced both the specificity and the sensitivity of PCR. It has the potential to detect residual bacterial viability prior to reimplantation in the two-stage revision for PJI.

Highlights

  • Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication after joint replacement leading to great morbidity and significant burden to health care systems

  • Though the incidence of PJI according to Public Health England is currently 0.6% [1], infection accounted for 14.8% and 25.2% of revision operations after hip and knee arthroplasty respectively and was the

  • ΔCt viable increased with the increase of Propidium monoazide (PMA) concentration from 20 to 100 μM

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication after joint replacement leading to great morbidity and significant burden to health care systems. It is one of the most feared modes of failure of arthroplasty because of the difficulty in diagnosis and treatment. The usual treatment for PJI is two-stage revision, where the infected joint is opened and explored, and all infected tissue and the prosthetic components are removed. At the second stage new prosthetic components are inserted but only after several weeks of antibiotic treatment to ensure as far as possible that the infecting bacteria have been eradicated. The prevalence of culture-negative PJI in the literature ranges from 7 [4] to more than 40% [5, 6]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call