Prophylactic vs. Reactive Gastrostomy Tube Placement in Patients Treated with Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer

Abstract

Radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC) can cause acute toxicities resulting in weight loss warranting alterative enteral access. Some institutions favor prophylactic gastrostomy tube (GT) placement to prevent malnutrition at the forefront, while others choose to reactively place tubes if nutritional deficits arise. Though prophylactic GT placement may limit on-treatment weight loss, this approach may result in unneeded GT placement and may potentially impact long-term swallowing function. Patients with HNC treated with CRT from 2018-2021 were reviewed. GT placement prior to CRT (prophylactic [ppx] tube) was performed at the discretion of the treating radiation oncologist. The remainder of patients were treated with reactive (rx) GT placement in the event of on-treatment weight loss approaching 10-15%. Patient, disease and treatment factors were abstracted from the medical record. Primary endpoints were placement of GT in the rx group, weight change at the end of RT, and time to tube removal. In total, 278 patients were identified; 35 GT-dependent patients and 22 patients with nasal cavity/paranasal sinus cancers were excluded, yielding 221 for analysis. Baseline factors associated with GT group included age, ECOG, baseline swallowing function, primary site, T and N stage, stage group, and treatment year. Treatment factors associated with GT group were: neck target (bilateral v. unilateral/none), concurrent chemotherapy, and total dose. Of the 118 patients in the rx group, 14 (12%) required rx GT placement during or within 30 days of CRT. RT completion rates were similar between groups (95-96%, p = 1). GT was removed at last follow-up in 57% of patients in both groups (p = 1). Percent on-treatment weight loss was -8.9% (SD 6.7) and -7.2% (SD 6.1) for the ppx and rx groups, respectively (p = 0.04). Median Kaplan-Meier estimate of time to GT removal was 7.7 months (95% CI 6.0-11.3) and did not differ between groups (log-rank p = 0.87). Factors associated with the placement of rx GT include: concurrent chemotherapy (yes 20% vs. No 0%, p.0007) and baseline FOIS (5 or less 40% vs. 6 or more 9%, p = 0.02). T stage, N stage, overall stage, postoperative RT, degree of neck irradiation were not associated. Reactive gastrostomy tube placement in patients treated with chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer patients is feasible and results in low rates of gastrostomy tube placement. There are no observed differences in on-treatment weight loss between patients treated using a prophylactic versus reactive approach. No differences in time to gastrostomy tube removal were observed.