Prophylactic Postoperative High Flow Nasal Oxygen Versus Conventional Oxygen Therapy in Obese Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery (OXYBAR Study): a Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial.

Abstract

Patients with obesity are predisposed to a reduction in end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) and atelectasis after anaesthesia. High flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) may increase EELV, reducing the likelihood of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC). We conducted a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) of conventional oxygen therapy versus HFNO after bariatric surgery. The aim was to investigate the feasibility of using electrical impedance tomography (EIT) as a means of assessing respiratory mechanics and to inform the design of a definitive RCT. We performed a single-centre, parallel-group, pilot RCT. Adult patients with obesity undergoing elective bariatric surgery were eligible for inclusion. We excluded patients with a known contraindication to HFNO or with chronic lung disease. Fifty patients were randomised in equal proportions. One patient crossed over from conventional O2 to HFNO. Delta EELI was higher at 1hour in patients receiving HFNO (mean difference = 831 Au (95% CI - 1636-3298), p = 0.5). Continuous EIT beyond 1hour was poorly tolerated. At 6hours, there were no differences in PaO2/FiO2 ratio or PaCO2. Only one patient developed a PPC (in the HFNO group) by 6weeks. These data suggest that a large-scale RCT of HFNO after bariatric surgery in an 'all-comers' population is likely infeasible. While EIT was an effective means of assessing respiratory mechanics, it was impractical over time. Similarly, the infrequency of PPC precludes its use as a primary outcome. Future studies should focus on identifying patients at the greatest risk of PPC.