Prophylactic action of lipid and non-lipid tear supplements in adverse environmental conditions: A randomised crossover trial

Abstract

PurposeTo evaluate the prophylactic benefits of lipid-based and non-lipid-based artificial tear lubricants, in dry eye disease, after adverse environmental exposure. MethodsTwenty-eight participants with dry eye disease were recruited in a prospective, double-masked, randomised crossover trial. On separate days, participants were randomised to receive a single application of a lipid-containing tear supplement (Systane Complete) to one eye, and a non-lipid containing eye drop (Systane Ultra) to the contralateral eye. Participants were then exposed to a previously validated simulated adverse environment. Symptoms, non-invasive tear film breakup time, lipid layer grade, and tear meniscus height were assessed at three time points; baseline, following eye drop instillation, and after exposure to the adverse environment. ResultsBoth treatments effected improvements in symptoms and non-invasive tear film stability following instillation (all p < 0.05), although an improvement in lipid layer quality was limited to the lipid-containing nano-emulsion tear supplement (p = 0.003). Although protective effects were conferred by both treatments following exposure to the simulated adverse environment, more favourable symptomology scores, non-invasive tear film stability, and lipid layer quality were observed in the lipid-containing tear supplement group (all p < 0.05). No significant changes were observed in tear meniscus height in both treatment groups (all p > 0.05). ConclusionsBoth the lipid and non-lipid-based artificial tear supplement demonstrated prophylactic benefits in a simulated adverse environment. However, the ability to preserve tear film quality and reduce dry eye symptomology was greater with the lipid-containing eye drop. Trial registration numberACTRN12619000361101