Abstract
It is shown that if X k satisfy P( X k < a k ∣ X 1 < a 1,…, X k-1 < a k-1 ) is nondecreasing in a 1,…, a k-1 , a negative dependence condition slightly weaker than CDS, and 0 ⩽ X k ⩽ 1, then E[max X k ] ⩽ 2 V – V 2, where V = sup EX t , t, a stopping rule, holds both for finite and infinite sequences X 1, X 2,…. Actually, here V can be replaced by the optimal value attainable by threshold rules.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.