Abstract
Physical and mechanical properties of four commercial micro-filled composite resins, a visible light-cured composite resin, and a conventional composite resin were investigated. Isocap, Isopast, and Superfil were similar in most properties. Compared with Concise, they had lower values of inorganic filler content and modulus of elasticity and higher values of water sorption, depth of indentation, and linear coefficient of thermal expansion. The properties of Silar were between those of Concise and the other microfilled composite resins. Fotofil had lower values of modulus of elasticity, water sorption, and linear coefficient of thermal expansion than Concise.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
