Abstract

BackgroundBiological networks keep their functions robust against perturbations. Many previous studies through simulations or experiments have shown that feedback loop (FBL) structures play an important role in controlling the network robustness without fully explaining how they do it. Hence, there is a pressing need to more rigorously analyze the influence of FBL structures on network robustness.ResultsIn this paper, I propose a novel node classification notion based on the FBL structures involved. More specifically, I classify a node as a no-FBL-in-upstream (NFU) or no-FBL-in-downstream (NFD) node if no feedback loop is involved with any upstream or downstream path of the node, respectively. Based on those definitions, I first prove that every NFU node is eventually frozen in Boolean dynamics. Thus, NFU nodes converge to a fixed value determined by the upstream source nodes. Second, I prove that a network is robust against an arbitrary state perturbation subject to a non-source NFD node. This implies that a network state eventually sustains the attractor despite a perturbation subject to a non-source NFD node. Inspired by this result, I further propose a perturbation-sustainable probability that indicates how likely a perturbation effect is to be sustained through propagations. I show that genes with a high perturbation-sustainable probability are likely to be essential, disease, and drug-target genes in large human signaling networks.ConclusionTaken together, these results will promote understanding of the effects of FBL on network robustness in a more rigorous manner.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12918-016-0322-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Biological networks keep their functions robust against perturbations

  • The other is that a network is robust against an arbitrary perturbation subject to a non-source NFD node

  • It is well known that biological networks can keep their regulatory functions robust against external or internal perturbations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Biological networks keep their functions robust against perturbations. Many previous studies through simulations or experiments have shown that feedback loop (FBL) structures play an important role in controlling the network robustness without fully explaining how they do it. Some tools have been proposed to quantify the network robustness by simulating the state transitions after randomly initializing the node states [13,14,15,16,17]. They have a limitation in network size for analysis, though, due to the exponential complexity of attractor computation. It is a critical issue to find analytic results that can identify trivial parts that do not require further computation of state transitions

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call