Abstract
Abstract. This study presents Cloudnet retrievals of Arctic clouds from measurements conducted during a 3-month research expedition along the Siberian shelf during summer and autumn 2014. During autumn, we find a strong reduction in the occurrence of liquid clouds and an increase for both mixed-phase and ice clouds at low levels compared to summer. About 80 % of all liquid clouds observed during the research cruise show a liquid water path below the infrared black body limit of approximately 50 g m−2. The majority of mixed-phase and ice clouds had an ice water path below 20 g m−2. Cloud properties are analysed with respect to cloud-top temperature and boundary layer structure. Changes in these parameters have little effect on the geometric thickness of liquid clouds while mixed-phase clouds during warm-air advection events are generally thinner than when such events were absent. Cloud-top temperatures are very similar for all mixed-phase clouds. However, more cases of lower cloud-top temperature were observed in the absence of warm-air advection. Profiles of liquid and ice water content are normalized with respect to cloud base and height. For liquid water clouds, the liquid water content profile reveals a strong increase with height with a maximum within the upper quarter of the clouds followed by a sharp decrease towards cloud top. Liquid water content is lowest for clouds observed below an inversion during warm-air advection events. Most mixed-phase clouds show a liquid water content profile with a very similar shape to that of liquid clouds but with lower maximum values during events with warm air above the planetary boundary layer. The normalized ice water content profiles in mixed-phase clouds look different from those of liquid water content. They show a wider range in maximum values with the lowest ice water content for clouds below an inversion and the highest values for clouds above or extending through an inversion. The ice water content profile generally peaks at a height below the peak in the liquid water content profile – usually in the centre of the cloud, sometimes closer to cloud base, likely due to particle sublimation as the crystals fall through the cloud.
Highlights
Over the past 30 years the rate of Arctic warming has been consistently larger than the global average, by a factor of 2–3 (Stocker et al, 2013)
Climate models agree on an enhanced Arctic warming, sometimes referred to as the Arctic amplification (Polyakov et al, 2002; Serreze and Francis, 2006; Serreze and Barry, 2011), they largely fail to predict the accelerated retreat of Arctic sea ice (Stroeve et al, 2012)
There is a clear separation between height ranges dominated by liquid water (< 1.2 km) and by ice clouds (> 1.2 km)
Summary
Over the past 30 years the rate of Arctic warming has been consistently larger than the global average, by a factor of 2–3 (Stocker et al, 2013). Climate models agree on an enhanced Arctic warming, sometimes referred to as the Arctic amplification (Polyakov et al, 2002; Serreze and Francis, 2006; Serreze and Barry, 2011), they largely fail to predict the accelerated retreat of Arctic sea ice (Stroeve et al, 2012). This is at least partly caused by an inadequate description of the processes that control the coupled oceanic–atmospheric energy balance and the feedback mechanisms between sea-ice cover and other components of the Arctic climate system (Liu et al, 2012a), clouds
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
