Abstract

We propose a ranking-based semantics to sort the arguments in an Abstract Argumentation Framework, according to their level of acceptability. This approach is based on a two- criteria method and is a direct extension of the classical three-level justification status of arguments into more layers. Then, we compare such a semantics with the literature, by showing which of the classical properties of ranking-based semantics hold. This leads us to rediscuss some of the existing properties: Self Contradiction and Non-attacked Equivalence.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.