Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate new and traditional surface materials for use in cattle barns. The evaluated concrete materials had different compositions and included different additives and coatings. Contact angle meter, optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy SEM were used for characterization of surface properties. Radiochemical methods and a biochemical adenosine triphosphate ATP method were used to determine cleanability. A specific methodological aim was to examine the correlations between these determination methods. A statistically significant difference was observed between contact angles of non-coated concretes, coated concretes and joint materials. In general, coatings smoothened surfaces and the joint materials were the roughest surfaces, as illustrated by profilometry and SEM. On the basis of the radiochemical determination methods, coatings improved the cleanability of concrete. An epoxy joint material was cleaned efficiently from the oil model soil and from the labelled feed soil when compared to the two cement-based joint materials. According to the results of the biochemical ATP method the manure test soil was cleaned better from a concrete including inorganic sealant than from the other materials examined. The cleanability results of oil model soil used in the radiochemical method correlated with the results of the test feed soil used in the biochemical ATP method. Both determination methods of cleanability appeared to be suitable for examining the cleanability of surfaces soiled with agricultural soils. Only the radiochemical determination gives detailed quantitative results, but it can be used only in laboratory studies. The results of this laboratory study will be used for selecting materials for a pilot study in a cattle barn.;

Highlights

  • Material choices in agricultural environments affect animal welfare, hygienic condition of surfaces and products, and the working environment of the personnel

  • When evaluating surface materials used in animal houses it should be remembered that surfaces which are too smooth may be slippery for animals and personnel, and cause injuries

  • On the plastic coatings the residues of labelled feed soil were lower than those of labelled manure. In accordance with this result, the coatings improved the cleanability of surfaces from labelled feed soil (p = 0.021 in the analysis of variance) but not from labelled manure soil (p = 0.412)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Material choices in agricultural environments affect animal welfare, hygienic condition of surfaces and products, and the working environment of the personnel. The flooring should not cause injuries, diseases, distress and discomfort or inconvenience to animals (Baxter 1984). The properties of the flooring materials which must be considered include e.g thermal comfort, softness, friction, abrasiveness and contact pressure between animal and floor (Nilsson 2005). When evaluating surface materials used in animal houses it should be remembered that surfaces which are too smooth may be slippery for animals and personnel, and cause injuries. The amount of soil and moisture on the flooring influence the floor properties; above all soil affects the slipperiness (Nilsson 2005)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.