Abstract
Background When chest tube drainage does not adequately resolve thoracic empyema, video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is often needed. However, the proper duration of antibiotics after VATS is poorly defined. Consequently, the objective of this study was to evaluate if short antibiotic durations post-VATS was equally effective compared to longer durations. Methods Patients with thoracic empyema treated with VATS were identified retrospectively by a query of the hospital billing database. The bacterial causes of the empyema were divided into 8 different categories while the antibiotic duration after VATS was divided into two groups which included antibiotics ˂ 14 days and antibiotics >14 days. The primary outcome measured was rates of empyema recurrence. Statistical comparisons were conducted between the antibiotic duration groups overall and when stratified based on the different bacterial causes. Results 137 patients were included in this study with the main cause of empyema being culture negative empyema (37.2%) while alpha haemolytic Streptococcus spp. was the most cultured bacteria (26.3%). There was no statistical difference (p = 0.5168), in the rates of empyema recurrence, when short antibiotic durations (median 11.6 days)were compared to longer antibiotic durations (median 29.1 days)post-VATS. Nor was there a statistical difference in recurrence rates when stratifying based on bacterial cause. Conclusion This study reinforces that antibiotic durations less than 14 days post-VATS are equally effective as prolonged antibiotic durations. However, to determine the proper duration of antibiotic therapy post-VATS, a prospective clinical trial is needed to reduce complications of prolonged antibiotic therapies for these patients.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.