Abstract
In this study, the application of surface roughness on model and full scale marine propellers in order to mitigate tip vortex cavitation is evaluated. To model the turbulence, SST k−ω model along with a curvature correction is employed to simulate the flow on an appropriate grid resolution for tip vortex propagation, at least 32 cells per vortex diameter according to our previous guidelines. The effect of roughness is modelled by modified wall functions. The analysis focuses on two types of vortices appearing on marine propellers: tip vortices developing in lower advance ratio numbers and leading edge tip vortices developing in higher advance ratio numbers. It is shown that as the origin and formation of these two types of vortices differ, different roughness patterns are needed to mitigate them with respect to performance degradation of propeller performance. Our findings clarify that the combination of having roughness on the blade tip and a limited area on the leading edge is the optimum roughness pattern where a reasonable balance between tip vortex cavitation mitigation and performance degradation can be achieved. This pattern in model scale condition leads to an average TVC mitigation of 37% with an average performance degradation of 1.8% while in full scale condition an average TVC mitigation of 22% and performance degradation of 1.4% are obtained.
Highlights
A hydrodynamically optimum propeller design usually does not have an optimum hydroacoustic performance as their design restrictions are contradictory (Sezen et al, 2016)
In higher J values, i.e. 1.1 < J, the trend of thrust and torque predictions between model scale and full scale switches where both of forces are underpredicted in the full scale condition, this is more apparent for the thrust
The negative effects of roughness on the propeller performance can be minimized when the roughness area is optimized based on the flow properties and structures effective in tip vortex formation and devel opment
Summary
A hydrodynamically optimum propeller design usually does not have an optimum hydroacoustic performance as their design restrictions are contradictory (Sezen et al, 2016) This has even further importance for low-noise propellers as their operating profile requires very low radiated noise emissions mostly generated by cavitation (Kuiper, 1981). An unloaded tip design forces the loading towards inner radii and at these inner radii, leading edge separation, and a leading edge vortex, may be formed and the trailing vortices become more evenly distributed (Long et al, 2020; Lu et al, 2014) In this condition, effects of non-uniform flow field (Korkut and Atlar, 2002; Pereira et al, 2016), and blade surface roughness (Dreyer, 2015; Felli and Falchi, 2011) should be considered
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
