Abstract

Based on long-term (>30 years) monthly streamflow data from two catchments with different hydrological features, i.e., snowmelt-driven in Harp Lake, south-central, Canada and rainfall-driven in Dongjiang river, south China, the differences in the hydrological drought (HD) propagation characteristics identified by fixed (FDT) and variable drought thresholds (VDT) were explored. The results showed that (i) despite both FDT and VDT methods being able to describe HD propagation patterns well (i.e., slow intensification but quick recovery), the onset time, peak intensity time, and termination time of HD within a year were significantly different between the two methods, due to the different drought conceptual backgrounds of the methods. (ii) The HD months identified by VDT were close to evenly distributed in each month of the year, while the HD months identified by FDT were mainly concentrated in the dry season. (iii) The onset, peak intensity, and termination time of HD identified by FDT were in good agreement with the dryness/wetness attributes of the two study basins and can be recommended in the study case. (iv) More methods for monitoring and predicting HD, and for revealing the driving mechanisms for HD propagation, are needed.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call