Abstract

신 존재의 고전적인 증명에 대한 칸트의 비평은 자연신학이 재탄생하는 데에 있어 주요한 장애물이다. 대부분의 철학자들은 어떠한 실증도 없이, 이 비평이 파괴적이고 최종적이라고 믿는다. 하지만 우리가 보기에는 그렇지 않다. 그러므로 우리는 이 논문을 통해 신 존재 증명(순수이성의 이율배반에 필수적으로 포함되는)에 대한 칸트의 비평이 성립되지 않으며, 유신론적 형이상학의 고전적 논쟁의 힘을 빼앗아가지 않는다는 것을 보여 주려 한다.Kantian criticism of the classical proofs of the existence of God is the main obstacle to the rebirth of natural theology. Most philosophers believe, without having verified, that this criticism is devastating and definitive. It seems to us that this is not the case. We therefore try in this article to show that the Kantian criticism of the proofs of the existence of God (contained essentially in the Antinomies of Pure Reason) does not hold, and that it has not taken away from their strength the classical arguments of theistic metaphysics.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.