Proof-of-Concept Study of a 3-D Ultrasound Scanner Used for Ankle Joint Assessment.

Abstract

Joint arthropathies often require continuous monitoring of the joint condition, typically performed using magnetic resonance (MR) or ultrasound (US) imaging. US imaging is often the preferred screening or diagnostic tool as it is fast and inexpensive. However, conventional 2-D US has limited capability to compare imaging results between examinations because of its operator dependence and challenges related to repeat imaging in the same location and orientation. Comparison between several imaging sessions is crucial to assess the interval progression of joint conditions. We propose a novel 3-D US scanner for ankle joint assessment that can partially overcome these issues by enabling 3-D imaging. Here, we (i) present the design of the 3-D US ankle scanner system, (ii) validate the geometric reconstruction accuracy of the system, (iii) provide preliminary images of healthy volunteer ankles and (iv) compare 3-D US imaging results with MR imaging. The 3-D ankle scanner consists of a tub filled with water, a linear US probe attached to the wall of the tub and a motorized unit that rotates the US probe 360° around the center of the tub. As the probe rotates, a 3-D US image is formed of the ankle of the patient positioned in the middle of the tub. US probe height, angle and distance from the tub center can be adjusted. The reconstruction accuracy of the system was validated in each of the coordinate directions at different probe angles using two test phantoms. A phantom consisting of numerous Ø200-µm nylon threads with known spacing and a metal rod with machined grooves was used for validation in the horizontal and vertical directions, respectively. The volumetric reconstruction accuracy validation was performed by imaging an agar phantom with two embedded spheres of known volumes and comparing the segmented sphere volume and surface area with the expected. Three-dimensional US and MR images of both ankles of five healthy volunteers were acquired. Distal tibia and proximal talus were segmented in both imaging modalities and the surfaces of these segmentations were compared using the 95% Hausdorff and mean surface distances. The observed mean linear measurement error in all the coordinate directions and over several probe angles was 2.98%. The mean measured volumetric measurement error was 3.45%. The volunteer study revealed useful features for joint assessment present in the 3-D ankle scanner images, such as joint spacing, distal tibia and proximal talus. The mean 95% Hausdorff and mean surface distances between segmentations in 3-D US and MR images were 5.68 ± 0.83 and 2.01 ± 0.30 mm, respectively. In this proof-of-concept study, the 3-D US ankle scanner enabled visualization of the ankle joint features that are useful for joint assessment.