Abstract
AbstractProof has traditionally been seen as an important aspect of the advanced mathematics curriculum. The study reported here examines the proof practices and constructs of a group of students educated within a ‘post‐Cockcroft’ mathematics curriculum. It finds that although, in the spirit of the reformed curriculum, students are actively involved in developing mathematical ideas, this is within a restricted mode in which ideas of enquiry have become largely instrumentalised. In particular, validation is primarily and predominantly empirical, and there is little concern for illumination and systematisation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.